Thursday, November 10, 2011

Rick Perry's ties to paramilitary groups.

Home spun paramilitary groups (Militias) are becoming bolder as they see support from tea party members and tea party elected officials.

The question is do we want armed groups parading in town streets much like we see in third world countries? Do we need war lords independent of any laws but their own? To declare war on neighboring groups, turning the nation into warring clans battling for domination?

These groups openly profess the overthrow of any form of government, refuse to pay taxes, and vow to only follow laws they endorse.

Now these radical groups are obtaining a voice in government via the tea party fanatics and who knows? ........ they may even be funded by the likes of extreme billionaires.

Far too many people see the tea party as a harmless group of Americans who only want to repair government, but in reality they are backed and supported by the most illogical and dangerous members of government and business.

One of the Republican presidential candidates has contacted these groups and helped to pass legislation they had been proposing ...... even after the said groups had committed numerous felonies and treason against the federal and state governments.

Governor Rick Perry has been flip flopping on the idea of secession. Well, when he was still for it, before he made his run for President, he garnered the support of a very radical and dangerous militia group ....... the Republic of Texas militia.

This militia, which has a long history of terrorism, including plots to assassinate a Republican governor (who later became President), a sitting Democratic President, and attempted attacks on a US Army base and federal building, and even attempted to acquire missiles and biological weapons http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/07/rick-perry%E2%80%99s-ties-to-a-terrorist-militia/.

Can a man be trusted who has shown such a lack of respect for the form of government he is now wanting to be the leader of? Can the people depend on him to uphold his oath of office?

I, for one, wouldn’t trust him. Nor do I trust those who, while campaigning, don’t disclose entirely what they propose until after they are sworn in.

No comments:

Post a Comment